Showing posts with label Pope Francis I. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pope Francis I. Show all posts

Sunday, March 16, 2014

Pray for the Pope: Words from Gene Robinson

From my friend Gene Robinson, the retired bishop of New Hampshire...



The Daily Beast




A Gay Bishop’s Prayer for Francis
.
I love this new pope. I pray for him every day—for his ministry, his safety, and the daunting tasks that lay before him. I like all the connotations of “Francis,” the papal name he took, conjuring the saint whose humility, sympathy for the fragile condition of humankind, and his commitment to the poor still are both exemplary and legendary.

Perhaps most dramatic in that change of tone came in his question, after he was asked about gay priests: “Who am I to judge?” Who indeed?  His immediate predecessors seemed not to hesitate in heaping judgment on homosexuals, women (especially those who made the excruciating decision to have an abortion), the divorced, and a vast array of people who fell short of the Vatican’s moral ideal (exempting at times, of course, members of the Church’s own clergy and hierarchy from those same ideals).But I am under no illusions that the journey ahead will be easy for this new pope, assuming that he continues to move in the directions he has thus far signaled.  And let’s be clear:  Pope Francis has, so far, only changed the tenor and tone of the voice of the Church he leads. That is no small thing, of course, when most Catholics and non-Catholics alike experienced his predecessor as aloof, hierarchical, and pretentious.
How odd that the leader of the Catholic Church would make big news, espousing an attitude promoted by Jesus of Nazareth himself. Jesus dramatically lived out the command to “judge not,” so why would it be such news when his followers (not to mention the Pope!) would follow in his humble, non-judgmental footsteps?!  It is only a newsworthy development because there had been little evidence of non-judgmental and loving acceptance by his predecessors.
In other words, so far, so good—but it is only a good beginning. The hard work lies ahead: There is more to the Christian enterprise than merely being more kind, more sympathetic.
One of my favorite old sayings goes like this:  “It’s not enough to pull drowning people out of a raging stream; we must walk back upstream, and see who is throwing them in in the first place!”  Charity (pulling people out of whatever raging stream they’re in, like poverty, disease, discrimination, hunger) is a great and cherished tradition. Nothing wrong with it—as far as it goes. In addition to rescue and charity work, people of faith—indeed all who long for justice—must also do the hard, systemic work of changing the systems that cause and trap people in demeaning, dehumanizing conditions in the first place.  Some of those oppressive systems are found in the Church itself! Not just the pope’s church, but my church and every religious community of believers.
If Pope Francis is to be believed in all the kindly pronouncements of his first year (and I do), his good tone should be followed by the tough work of changing the systems of belief, doctrine and religious practice which perpetuate the victimization of those he seeks to serve. It is a small step forward to say of homosexuals, “Who am I to judge?”  Yet the official teaching of the Catholic Church is that homosexuals are “intrinsically disordered.”  Not a lot of wriggle room in that, is there?  That judgment and teaching about LGBT people is the basis for discrimination, rejection and violence the world over. It is fine to verbally decry the ecclesial “circle the wagons” approach to the child sexual abuse exposed in the last two decades, but real commitment to the safety of vulnerable children will require the Church to take steps to value and protect those children over the careers and reputations of its abusing priests.  Positive comments about the contributions of women in and to the Church sound fine, but what is needed is a long, hard look at its entire approach to human sexuality and gender which still treats its female adherents as “less than.”
I do not mean to be uncharitable here, nor naive. Such systemic overhaul of an institution that has existed for the better part of two millennia cannot and will not happen overnight, if it is seriously tried at all. Under the leadership of Pope Francis, the Church may have the best chance at giving it a serious try since the Second Vatican Council under Pope John XXIII.  But the Vatican Curia was there before he was elected pope, and it will be there long after his ministry ends.  There will be resistance to any change, much less the kind of change to which Francis’s humble ways point.  Over the years, we have learned what happens to people who are just too good for us!  But this pope seems to know that sacrifice is part of the deal of living with God.
I hope this pope keeps surprising and delighting us, sitting a boy in his papal chair and allegedly sneaking out of the Vatican at night to work with the homeless!  I hope he continues to show us the mind of Christ by his acts of humility and compassion. I pray that he persists in eschewing luxury and pretension. And I pray that he will stay close to the Son of God he is supposed to represent on earth, despite the institution’s every effort to tame their new leader and rob him of his pizazz.
The Catholic Church is a mighty big ship to turn around, even with a beautiful, charismatic, and inspiring captain at the helm. But God is good, and God will be at Francis’ side as he challenges the Church to live up to its lofty, humble, servant values. Like I said, I pray for him every day.

Tuesday, March 19, 2013

Our Reformed Anglican tradition in need of reform at the top?

The Vatican
Jorge Bergolio, the Argentine cardinal who was elected as the 266th pope in the Roman Catholic Church, will be inaugurated today as Francis I. By all reports, the ceremony will be amid less pomp than when the previous pope ascended the throne of St. Peter, and will have a few more nods to the branches of Christianity beyond the Vatican. All of this is good news.

I have posted here a number of commentaries in the last few days about the life story and style of the new pope. He has already brought much needed humility to the Vatican, and has shown a preference to the poor and a refreshing pastoral presence. Whether he will be a good pope, time will tell, and I leave that analysis to those better qualified than myself to comment on the Roman Catholic Church.

I would bid that all of us keep Francis in our prayers. Like it as not, Pope Francis is the most visible face not just of Catholicism but of all Christianity in the world. His success can only benefit the full Body of Christ in all places; his failure will hurt all of us.

That brings me to our particular branch of the Body of Christ, the Anglican Communion, which is the second largest communion of Christians in the world next to the Catholics. The Anglican Communion – that’s us – will be represented today at the pope’s inauguration by a delegation appointed by Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, who as it happens will also be inaugurated this week on Thursday. Let's also keep him in our prayers this week, for he is the most visible face of Anglicanism in the world.

Our Anglican Communion is officially represented today at the inauguration of the new Pope. But makeup of our delegation says a great deal about what is wrong with the governance of our communion.

We are an enormously diverse Communion worldwide, but you wouldn’t know it by looking at the delegation Archbishop Justin has appointed to represent us at the Vatican today. The 12-person delegation is nearly all men and mostly British (there is a Canadian, a New Zealander, an Irish canon and at least one American). There are two women, one who is a layperson. The delegation is top-heavy with bishops, but there are no women bishops. It is even being called a “fraternal delegation” by Lambeth Palace (our vatican).

To read the list of those on the delegation representing us, click HERE (and this is from the Archbishop's official website).

Canterbury Cathedral
There is a great deal that is wrong with this picture. You could argue that the delegation represents the major offices of the Anglican Communion, but that begs the question of who is in those offices and how they get there. It is at least as obtuse and inside-baseball as the Roman Catholic curia.

All of this ought to raise our hackles about reforming our Reformed tradition.

The previous archbishop, Rowan Williams, pushed very hard for an “Anglican Covenant” which contained a disciplinary proposal for keeping the 30-plus Anglican national provinces in line. His efforts failed largely because few wanted a top down worldwide system for discipline. We don’t want a pope.

Yet we should not let ourselves off the hook about the governance in our Communion. We ought to be embarrassed that primarily English men are representing our Communion, which has its center-of-gravity far outside Europe. The average Anglican is a poor African, not a vicar from Downton Abbey. There are probably more practicing Anglicans in Central and South America than there are in England.

While many critics point out that men dominate the Roman Catholic College of Cardinals, at least they come from many countries. Not so with the electors of the Archbishop of Canterbury. All come from one country: Great Britain. And the only eligible bishops for the head of our communion are British. And since women are still (inexcusably and inexplicably) ineligible to become bishops in Great Britain, only men are eligible to become Archbishop of Canterbury

We should be very wary about casting stones at the all-male College of Cardinals. Physicians, heal thy selves.

By James Richardson, Fiat Lux

Friday, March 15, 2013

Commentary from Joan Chittister


Who are the people who were waiting for Pope Francis?

Pat Howard, columnist and managing editor of the Erie Times-News, my hometown newspaper, brought his own experience of church-watching to this second papal election in eight years. His description of having been disappointed in the way the church has responded to the questions of the time in the last two papacies gave me a new way to understand what I have been hearing from so many people in so many places these last three weeks.
The importance of Howard's opinion piece as a bellwether comment lies in the fact that Erie, Pa., is not a hotbed of dissent against anything. On the contrary: This is the kind of small city Americans call "a great place to raise a family." There are churches in every neighborhood of every stripe in the Christian catalog. There are some longtime Jewish synagogues with their congregations deeply embedded in the life of the city. There is a growing Muslim social center and a strong core of new refugees. We are, that is, a mixed population, and we live together well. There is nothing either New Age or critically atheistic about the area's social climate. On the contrary: This is a place that registers "average" on just about every social index. Obviously, then, opinion here can be thought to cover a great deal of ground.
So while reams are being written about what kind of man this new pope should be -- scholar, saint, administrator, reformer, whatever -- Howard puts his finger on what kind of people are waiting for this pope, whoever and whatever he is. He describes his own growing disillusion with the character of the church and his reasons for it in ways that are eerily reminiscent of similar conversations across the country and from one group to another.
Howard is clear about the issue: "Pope Benedict's Vatican labeled ... as part of the problem (those who were) too willing to entertain questions and views the hierarchy has declared to be verboten ... too open to engaging the real lives, moral qualms and evolving understanding of people in the modern world. ...
"I still believe the church will change in due course," he concludes. "... What I underestimated was the weariness that comes with the waiting."
Support NCR's coverage of the conclave.
Donate now!
That's it exactly, I said to myself. It is weariness that is palpable in so many groups now. "I have very little hope in this election," I hear over and over again. "It will all simply go on business as usual," they say, and you can almost hear the sigh in the voices.
The problem is that weariness is far worse than anger. Far more stultifying than mere indifference. Weariness comes from a soul whose hope has been disappointed one time too many. To be weary is not a condition of the body -- that's tiredness. No, weariness is a condition of the heart that has lost the energy to care anymore.
People are weary of hearing more about the laws of the church than the love of Jesus.
People are weary of seeing whole classes of people -- women, gays and even other faith communities again -- rejected, labeled, seen as "deficient," crossed off the list of the acceptable.
They are weary of asking questions that get no answers, no attention whatsoever, except derision.
They suffer from the lassitude that sets in waiting for apologies that do not come.
There's an ennui that sets in when people get nothing but old answers to new questions.
There's even worse fatigue that comes from knowing answers to questions for which, as laypersons, they are never even asked.
More false news of a priest shortage drains the energy of the soul when you know that issue could easily be resolved by the numbers of married men and women who are standing in line waiting to serve if for some reason or other, some baptisms weren't worth less than others.
They get tired watching of Anglican converts and their children take their place at the altar.
It gets spiritually exhausting to go on waiting for a pastor again and instead getting a scolding, reactionary church whose idea of perfection is the century before the last one rather than the century after this one.
They're weary of seeing contraception being treated as more sinful than the sexual abuse of children.
All in all, they're weary of being told, "Don't even think about it." They're weary of being treated as if they are bodies and souls without a brain.
It's weariness, weariness, weariness. It's not an angry, violent, revolutionary response. It's much worse than that. It's a weary one, and weariness is a very dangerous thing. When people are weary, they cease to care; they cease to listen; they cease to wait.
These are the kind of people who waited for a new pope, whatever kind of man he might be.
At first sight, Jorge Mario Bergoglio -- Pope Francis -- is a quiet and humble man, a pastoral man and as a Latin American, a leader of 51 million Catholics, or the largest concentration of Catholics on the planet, which is not business-as-usual as far as papal history goes.
But perhaps the most profound and memorable moment of his introduction is that he presented himself on the balcony in front of thousands of people from all parts of the world not in the brocaded fashion of a pope, but in a simple white cassock.
And then came the real shock: He bowed to the people. Bowed. And asked them to pray a blessing down on him before he blessed them. Francis, I remembered, was the Christian who reached out to Muslims. Francis, the one who listened to every creature in the universe and dialogued with it.
Indeed, if this Francis, too, is a listener, there is hope for reconciliation, hope for healing, hope for the development of the church.
No doubt about it: We know who the people are who have been waiting for a pope and why they are weary. The question now is, Does he know how weary they are? And does he care? Really?
From where I stand, something has to change. Maybe, just maybe, this time ...

Wednesday, March 13, 2013

Pray for the new Pope


Like many in our world, I am surprised at the election of Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, 76, as the new Pope: a Jesuit, from Argentina, who is taking the name of perhaps the hardest saint there could be to emulate: Francis.

The Holy Spirit has surprised the world once again. No one from a religious order has ever been pope. No one from Americas. Until now.

I believe there is hope in his election for not just the Roman Catholic Church, and not just Christianity, but for the world.

And he has a gentle smile.

Please pray for the new pope, that he will be an instrument of unity, and not division; that he will challenge us to care for the poor and wounded in the world; that he will help heal the wounds of many created by the Catholic church, by all churches and all religions in this world; that he will find his way to change an institution seemingly impervious to change and that he will be open to long overdue reforms; and may he preach with courage and faith the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

On a personal note, all of my spiritual directors have been Jesuits, and I am much shaped by their spirituality, intellect, simplicity, commitment to the poor and social justice. To have a Jesuit pope is truly uncharted territory and remarkable.

And I liked his touch. "I'll see you soon," he said before departing the papal balcony.

Here is a link to an objective-sounding profile of Cardinal Bergolio from the National Catholic Reporter: HERE.

By James Richardson, Fiat Lux